![]() 07/21/2016 at 17:07 • Filed to: Trainlopnik | ![]() | ![]() |
I’m entranced by the sight of all those mechanicals working. Anyone have any idea how much those coupling rods weigh? Fascinating to see them move that quickly.
![]() 07/21/2016 at 17:15 |
|
I didn’t know anything about it, despite having a bunch of general steam train knowledge, so I looked it up. I would have thought such a mammoth would be a three cylinder, but apparently not. Did *not* recognize it from the
Shining Time Station
credits, it’s been too long.
![]() 07/21/2016 at 17:15 |
|
Wow...I’m always amazed by the machining on these things. For 100-150 year old hardware, I never cease to be impressed standing next to an old locomotive. Almost everything is hand built, bespoke, small production runs. And gigantic, yet with pretty small tolerances. I don't know how they did it.
![]() 07/21/2016 at 17:17 |
|
I know. The idea of trying to make wheels that big perfectly round and balanced blows my mind.
![]() 07/21/2016 at 17:20 |
|
what is teh purpose of the big blinder looking things on the side of the boiler?
![]() 07/21/2016 at 17:22 |
|
Couldn’t tell you.
![]() 07/21/2016 at 17:29 |
|
Smoke deflectors referred to as ‘ elephant ears ’
![]() 07/21/2016 at 17:32 |
|
Mentioned it before, but grew up along the UP mainline east of Cheyenne, so had plenty of opportunities to hear/see 844 or the Challenger heading out and back to various events. Rare and impressive monsters.
![]() 07/21/2016 at 17:51 |
|
I recently had the opportunity to ride on a steam train, albeit with a smaller and older locomotive, and all I can say is I was happy. There’s something about trains and even moreso about steam trains that makes people truly happy. It felt like progress even though it was a 100+ year old engine. Must be the esscence of Modernity.
![]() 07/21/2016 at 20:31 |
|
God I love steam locos
![]() 07/21/2016 at 22:00 |
|
Freaking awesome!
Weirdly enough, I was just watching some of my favorite train videos.
!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!
!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!
!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!
And then here’s a video I shot of the same one above.
![]() 07/22/2016 at 13:46 |
|
American railroads never took to 3 cylinder steam engines. They didn’t like the extra cost involved in maintaining it, relative to the extra efficiency and power it provided. The solution was simply to make larger and larger locomotives, as cheaply as possible.
European railroads, with tighter size constraints, higher fuel costs, and shorter haul distances (where regular maintenance happened more frequently) thought the extra effort of a third cylinder was worth it.